I wonder what it must be like to be a guy these days. What with so many high profile child molestation cases in the news, do you feel under scrutiny? Everywhere, I see adverts for 'female babysitters' or 'female day care providers.' I guess the whole male race is now being watched in case they are potential abusers.
Take yesterday, I was at the park with my kids, when I see this man wandering about the playground, who, actually, I have talked to a few times. Apart from being quite dull and telling me in a rapid fire way about the fascinating topic of computer programming, he seems like an okay dad to his seven year old son. Well, today it looked like he was in the park without his son, or at least, that was what it looked like. I didn't think twice about him. Several of the other parents at the playground, however, did. People stared at him, as he circled the playground, staring up at the clouds.
"Who is that guy?" they whispered to each other.
"Do you think he's a pervert?"
"Why doesn't he have any kids with him?"
"What should we do?"
In the end, someone said they were going to call park security to get the matter dealt with. Meanwhile, the man had wandered off down the hill, in the direction of a stream, which is often frequented by kids, who like to toss rocks into it.
A few minutes later, a security car pulled up and the parents gave an audible sigh of relief. The security guy then simply sat in the car for a few minutes and then drove off, which was a good thing, I suppose, because I would have hated for the computer nerd to have been arrested, for what exactly? For having a wierd way of talking and wandering around a playground looking a bit eccentric?
Eventually, because people were still going on about it, I turned to one mom and said, "Look, I think that guy's all right. He has a son. I don't know him that well, but I think he's okay." But even as I said it, paranoia gripped me and I thought, "What if I am defending a paedophile?" I guess I'd got caught up in the playground hysteria.
The woman replied, "Oh, they all have families, that doesn't mean a thing."
Later, the computer nerd came back up the hill with his son, who must have been playing down there. I guess I felt sorry for the guy, because he'd been proven guilty without any proof. Of course, none of parents talked to him and gave him a wide berth.
I think the media has a lot to answer for, because it makes people read guilt into the most harmless situations. In this hyper paranoid age, people will see what they want to see. What do you say?
Monday, September 11, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)



























17 comments:
I guess it's better to be safe than sorry. It's bad to make uninformed decisions about people but I'm sure the man would've had a chance to explain himself if the security guard approached him. Or at least I hope he would've.
I agree it does seem like a witch hunt. The actual probability of any of our kids running across a pedophile is slim to none. The trick is that most folks would rather err on the side of paranoia, than make a huge mistake in trusting someone they shouldn't. Poor man.
Parents want someone to coach the Little League games, someone to be a Boy Scout leader, someone to volunteer their time at their kid's school. Yet look at their kids the wrong way and they will call "Security" in a heart beat. It isn't worth it.
Here's what I was doing on 9/11. I was at the headquarters of a very big airline advising them on whether it was unlawful for them to have a policy of only sitting women next to unaccompanied minors on longhaul flights. By the close of play and for reasons too obvious to require stating, they had stopped worrying about it.
This evening on the train home I sat opposite a woman with a child in a pushchair. The child got fractious and started kicking me. I was not sure what to do. I moved my legs out of the child's way but she simply leant over a little more and kicked at me. I couldn't move out of range without climbing up onto the seat. Mum was doing nothing. If I complained I would look like a child-hater picking, unrealistically, on a harassed mum on a busy commuter train for not doing her job. On the other hand if I just let the child touch me the mother might have drawn the conclusion that I was enjoying it and had me lynched.
You know, a big secret fear of mine is that, since my husband stays at home and takes the baby far more places than I do, he'll get the same treatment at a park or other place with lots of kids. Especially because the baby is light, like me, and my husband is darker, so it's not obvious they're related. That would just be so hurtful, you know? I guess that's just the society we live in-it's really sexism, if you think about it.
Emma:
It's so sad, I agree. But we're all a little whacky when it comes to kids, I guess. I'm glad you defended the man, someone had to. I would hope I would do the same in that situation; I always try to "check" my knee-jerk reactions by holding them under a light when I can.
But, having said this, I just today pulled my five year old out of her after school daycare three days a week because I saw the kids playing on the playground (kids in her daycare group) without an adult in sight. Any psycho could walk up and snatch a kid off the playground. Then I had to explain to my parent-friends why I quit the program. Not wanting to insinuate that they are bad parents, I simply said, "Oh, I just rearranged my schedule to save money on daycare." Cop out? I guess so.
i did a post about this
not about this directly, but similary. this is the blog in question.
have to say, you, as usual are correct in my mind
i get really angry when people judge before they know
really angry
p.s. you should ask him about fixing your blog, he'd probably know!! ;)
I agree that a lot of times people will jump to conclusions before getting the facts. I also agree that it's better to be safe than sorry. That makes it tough to say what to do in a situation like that. I guess the best thing would be to stop gossiping about him and do a double check of where your kids are and keep them close if you are nervous.
When I taught, we had to go to a workshop on preventing child abuse and sexual assult. I taught in a Catholic School and that was when all the uproar was happening about priests molesting altar boys. I'm not saying that parents could have prevented every case, but sometimes parents need to be a little bit smarter and ask a few more questions...they should be a little more aware of what's going on. I don't think that calling security on the guy was the right thing to do, but maybe someone could have approached him and talked to him. Who knows...I kinda feel bad for the guy, though.
It must be hell on eggshells being a male teacher or a coach or the like these days. Or even looking like you might not belong with a child like hippie mama's husband. Good for you for standing up for the bloke.
Perverts aren't always the obvious suspects anyway. They're just as likely to be good old Bobby whom everyone likes, always good for a story, great laugh when he's pissed, help anyone in trouble Bob. It's more often the old family friend than the stranger in the park. Not a happy thought but so say the statistics.
Liberalbanana - I think he would have been able to explain himself, but think how you'd feel, if you were a woman maybe just wandering around a park, asked if perchance you were looking to molest some kids (would never happen of course, to a woman, although women molest kids too, albeit to a much lesser degree). You'd probably be outraged, non?
Crankmama - It was just an interesting situation. Because although the man wasn't arrested or anything, you can see how easily it could happen, with ten parents say, giving 'evidence' that he was acting 'suspiciously.'
Cham - A very complicated situation, indeed. I wouldn't volunteer if I were a man!
Moobs - I sympathize with the situation on the train. If you so much as touch a child in any situation whatsoever you are in deep shit. Doesn't make any sense, but there you are.
Hippie Moma - that's what I think. It's sexism. It's saying men can't be trusted around children and therefore children should have as little contact with men as possible.
Viscountess of Funk - You absolutely did the right thing. It's not only the risk of perverts kidnapping them, other things can happen to kids when left unsupervised.
Krajcimama - Absolutely, parents should be smart and parents should ask questions and not automatically respect the authority of teachers or priests or whoever. I just don't think one should assume that every man is a potential child abuser, that's all.
Kiki - I read your post, and yes, of course it is the same thing with the current crap about every dark skinned person is automatically a 'potential' terrorist. Sometimes I think the world has gone mad!
Sam - I know, the threat is more likely to come from someone the child knows, so why such massive paranoia about strangers?
I'm afraid to drive our babysitter home at night, and make my six year old son come with me, or else my wife does it instead. I love kids, but I have to be careful how much I talk and hang out with them, for fear of how it looks. A mile away from my house, there live two registered sex offenders. I'm not sure what the answer to this dilemma is, but the facts are what they are. There are a great many people out there that are deviants, and nobody out there can tell the difference between the good and bad. In the old days we just weren't as aware. That had its advantages, but also some serious drawbacks too.
Wow.. I think that's really sad. I do think it's good to be protective.. but to what degree? I can't imagine the pain of losing a child to a kidnapper or someone who would do him/her harm. It's got to be a parent's worst nightmare. But those things can go too far, even if it's just gossip. Sad state of affairs we live in today.
you're so right about this - it's happening everywhere. men are regarded as pariahs around children. in reality, of course, kidnappings and so forth are vanishingly rare - and in any case, paedos are probably far too crafty to wander round in full view. kids are far more at risk on the internet, or from the vast numbers of 4x4s delivering their schoolmates to the school gates.
I think I would be as protective and concerned as you about a guy hanging around a playground. It's a reality in our world that sexual crimes are most often committed by men. My feeling is, if men feel bad about being feared for no reason, then they should join one of the many men's groups that are fighting sexual violence (like MCSR -- Men Can Stop Rape) instead of standing on the sidelines and letting women and children fend for themselves against rapists and other predators. That way, it would be easy to distinguish the good men from the bad.
The Boomer Chronicles
It is a sad state of affairs...
One of my friends has just become a stay at home dad... And he is a lepper. He always has to have his kid beside him or he is given the same one up...
He can not hang out and just let his kid run around he has to have her near him...
And since he is so painfully shy, and really has no interest in meeting new parents he is just looked upon as a freak...
He feels there stares... and he feels uncomfortable...
To the point it could rob his kid of going to the park...
the media is definitely a factor, they love to hype sex and violence and lather up some paranoia. i can't help but feel that if we all did a better job of building real communities with our neighbours we would have a better idea of who to trust. maybe that's naive.
Personally, I have nothing to do with anyone who imagines pedophiles and kidnappers lurking everywhere. What kind of dumb-ass pedophile would make himself conspicuous in a park full of vigilante mothers? That's just stupid. A real sexual predator wants you to trust him so you'll let him get his prey off alone somewhere.
The guys who creep me out are the ones fitting my kids with new shoes. What normal person wants to sell children's shoes? They've got to be perverts.
Post a Comment