
I came across the article below (Instruction and advice for the Young Bride) the other day, which purports to be marriage advice for the young bride of 1894. I'm pretty sure it is a wind up, and says more about what we think of as what sex was like in the 'bad old days' than how it actually was. Personally I don't think sex was any worse back then than it is now. There are plenty of awful lovers (male and female) now, and there were plenty back then. And I don't buy the idea peddled by sixties feminists, that hardly any females had orgasms before the sixties, and that after thirty years of marriage the husband would not at some point, even by accident, have given the wife an orgasm and thereafter possibly have wanted to please her by doing it again.
My mother has a theory about all this. You can say, oh cavemen were probably bad lovers, but look at any cross section of the animal kingdom, to which we are closely related. Take, for example, pigeons. Observe, if you will, pigeons and their mating rituals. You will see a wide cross section of behavior. First up are the bisexuals/nymphomaniacs who will hop on the back of any bird, be it male or female, be the object of lust covered in pigeon shit or having only one leg. This group is indiscriminate, gets straight to the point and doesn't care if it is rejected hundreds of times a day. Next are the ones who only do females, albeit in a forthright and in your face fashion. Then are the ones who dance about for hours in front of a female, seducing the dear girl and cooing away. These are the sensitive or metrosexual members of the pigeon race, and it is a miracle they have not died out. Last but not least are the ones who are only half hearted in the pigeon seduction technique. They coo about in front of a female for a bit, but are easily distracted by someone throwing a half eaten hot dog on the ground. These are the equivalent of the premature ejaculators and internet porn addicts of today, who can't be bothered with the real thing.
My point being, that throughout time, there have always been all manner of sexual behaviours from selfless to selfish.
And now, read the article and tell me if you think it's genuine:
INSTRUCTION AND ADVICE FOR THE YOUNG BRIDE
The following is a reprint from The Madison Institute Newsletter, Fall Issue, 1894:
On the Conduct and Procedure of the Intimate and Personal Relationships of the Marriage State for the Greater Spiritual Sanctity of this Blessed Sacrament and the Glory of God by Ruth Smythers beloved wife of The Reverend L.D. Smythers Pastor of the Arcadian Methodist Church of the Eastern Regional Conference Published in the year of our Lord 1894 Spiritual Guidance Press New York City
To the sensitive young woman who has had the benefits of proper upbringing, the wedding day is, ironically, both the happiest and most terrifying day of her life. On the positive side, there is the wedding itself, in which the bride is the central attraction in a beautiful and inspiring ceremony, symbolizing her triumph in securing a male to provide for all her needs for the rest of her life. On the negative side, there is the wedding night, during which the bride must pay the piper, so to speak, by facing for the first time the terrible experience of sex.
At this point, dear reader, let me concede one shocking truth. Some young women actually anticipate the wedding night ordeal with curiosity and pleasure! Beware such an attitude! A selfish and sensual husband can easily take advantage of such a bride. One cardinal rule of marriage should never be forgotten: GIVE LITTLE, GIVE SELDOM, AND ABOVE ALL, GIVE GRUDGINGLY. Otherwise what could have been a proper marriage could become an orgy of sexual lust.
On the other hand, the bride's terror need not be extreme. While sex is at best revolting and at worse rather painful, it has to be endured, and has been by women since the beginning of time, and is compensated for by the monogamous home and by the children produced through it.
It is useless, in most cases, for the bride to prevail upon the groom to forego the sexual initiation. While the ideal husband would be one who would approach his bride only at her request and only for the purpose of begetting offspring, such nobility and unselfishness cannot be expected from the average man.
Most men, if not denied, would demand sex almost every day. The wise bride will permit a maximum of two brief sexual experiences weekly during the first months of marriage. As time goes by she should make every effort to reduce this frequency. Feigned illness, sleepiness, and headaches are among the wife's best friends in this matter. Arguments, nagging, scolding, and bickering also prove very effective, if used in the late evening about an hour before the husband would normally commence his seduction.
Clever wives are ever on the alert for new and better methods of denying and discouraging the amorous overtures of the husband. A good wife should expect to have reduced sexual contacts to once a week by the end of the first year of marriage and to once a month by the end of the fifth year of marriage.
By their tenth anniversary many wives have managed to complete their child bearing and have achieved the ultimate goal of terminating all sexual contacts with the husband. By this time she can depend upon his love for the children and social pressures to hold the husband in the home.
Just as she should be ever alert to keep the quantity of sex as low as possible, the wise bride will pay equal attention to limiting the kind and degree of sexual contacts. Most men are by nature rather perverted, and if given half a chance, would engage in quite a variety of the most revolting practices. These practices include among others performing the normal act in abnormal positions; mouthing the female body; and offering their own vile bodies to be mouthed in turn.
Nudity, talking about sex, reading stories about sex, viewing photographs and drawings depicting or suggesting sex are the obnoxious habits the male is likely to acquire if permitted. A wise bride will make it the goal never to allow her husband to see her unclothed body, and never allow him to display his unclothed body to her. Sex, when it cannot be prevented, should be practiced only in total darkness. Many women have found it useful to have thick cotton nightgowns for themselves and pajamas for their husbands. These should be donned in separate rooms. They need not be removed during the sex act. Thus, a minimum of flesh is exposed.
Once the bride has donned her gown and turned off all the lights, she should lie quietly upon the bed and await her groom. When he comes groping into the room she should make no sound to guide him in her direction, lest he take this as a sign of encouragement. She should let him grope in the dark. There is always the hope that he will stumble and incur some slight injury which she can use as an excuse to deny him sexual access.
When he finds her, the wife should lie as still as possible. Bodily motion on her part could be interpreted as sexual excitement by the optimistic husband.
If he attempts to kiss her on the lips she should turn her head slightly so that the kiss falls harmlessly on her cheek instead. If he attempts to kiss her hand, she should make a fist. If he lifts her gown and attempts to kiss her anyplace else she should quickly pull the gown back in place, spring from the bed, and announce that nature calls her to the toilet. This will generally dampen his desire to kiss in the forbidden territory.
If the husband attempts to seduce her with lascivious talk, the wise wife will suddenly remember some trivial non-sexual question to ask him. Once he answers she should keep the conversation going, no matter how frivolous it may seem at the time. Eventually, the husband will learn that if he insists on having sexual contact, he must get on with it without amorous embellishment.
The wise wife will allow him to pull the gown up no farther than the waist, and only permit him to open the front of his pajamas to thus make connection. She will be absolutely silent or babble about her housework while he's huffing and puffing away. Above all, she will lie perfectly still and never under any circumstances grunt or groan while the act is in progress.
As soon as the husband has completed the act, the wise wife will start nagging him about various minor tasks she wishes him to perform on the morrow. Many men obtain a major portion of their sexual satisfaction from the peaceful exhaustion immediately after the act is over. Thus the wife must insure that there is no peace in this period for him to enjoy. Otherwise, he might be encouraged to soon try for more.
One heartening factor for which the wife can be grateful is the fact that the husband's home, school, church, and social environment have been working together all through his life to instill in him a deep sense of guilt in regards to his sexual feelings, so that he comes to the marriage couch apologetically and filled with shame, already half cowed and subdued. The wise wife seizes upon this advantage and relentlessly pursues her goal first to limit, later to annihilate completely her husband's desire for sexual expression."



























11 comments:
OMG!!! LOL!!!
In this day and age of quick and easy divorces, the tactics outlined in that article have been refined a bit... but they're still there to a lesser extent.
Albeit the author of this article is extremely cold and mustn't have ever had an orgasm.
Please visit Renegade's BS
Oddly there is no mention of love. But truly hi-larious, and obviously tongue in cheek (because tongues aren't allowed anywhere else!).
That has to be a parody, though I'm sure I've seen something similar that was serious and actually printed in a periodical of the time.
I know one thing, I'd have been burnt at the stake if I'd been around then!
Darwin was pigeon-fancier.
FACT!
I'm sure this must be a pisstake! LOL!
I have been guilty of putting my husband off sex, during the act, by mentioning something like "Ooh! I must remember to put out the rubbish!" or "Hey, that's one hell of a pimple on your bum!" I didn't mean it, I swear...!
I've got much better things to do during sex than think of England.
"GIVE LITTLE, GIVE SELDOM, AND ABOVE ALL, GIVE GRUDGINGLY. Otherwise what could have been a proper marriage could become an orgy of sexual lust"...well, I'm doing SOMETHING right!!! tee hee...
I would have been tarred and feathered back then, (before I was married)..whoo hooo....
very funny article. did you ever see harry enfield doing the 'mr cholmondley-warner' information films? there's such a funny one about sex - which they refer to as 'the act of unspeakableness itself'. i'll see if i can find it for you on youtube.
i'm going to be looking at pigeons with new respect.
x
contrary to most of your comments, i believe it to be true.
the author is the beloved wife of The Reverend L.D. Smythers Pastor of the Arcadian Methodist Church
you know what these religious types are like.
What's an orgasm?
That is definitely made up. Without a doubt. But it was very funny!
Thanks for the comment on my blog. Now I'm here, I think I'll dip into your archives. I fancy a read of the book too....
renegade...She may never have had an orgasm but I bet she had lots of time to make a mean preserve and to air her bed linens on a regular basis.
meva...Come on now! Love in marriage is a luxury.
fussy bitch ...you would have been hanged drawn and quartered back then.
overnight editor...so darwin was a pigeon fancier. As long as the love making was consensual it's fine by me!
cesca...you crack me up. I have thought stuff like that but I have never actually said it during the act.
forget me not...intriguing. I wonder what you do think about?
janet...you sound like you were NOT a very respectable woman before your marriage. I hope you are not saying that you had sexual intercourse before entering the sanctity of marriage? :)
mad muthas...yeah pigeons are very much misunderstood creatures, especially in London, where admittedly they look a fucking state.
Kiki...yeah the gist of it is believable but the wording is too modern. Although the use of the word "sex" to indicate the sex act was sort of known in the very late 1800s (it previously had been used only to indicate gender), its use in that form then would have been quite cutting edge. One wonders if a minister's wife would have thrown it about with such abandon. Surely "conjugal relations" would have been the term of choice.
Also I'm not sure that L D Smythers or his lady wife ever existed.
miss understood...what's an orgasm? You're asking the wrong person. Dunno, never had one lol
Post a Comment